When one becomes aware of what lies behind the United Nations Lack of Action, and their many alleged Money Skimming Scams, one has to ask when it will finally be dissolved, ridding this world of one of the most costly and inefficient organisations on the planet. The United Nations is a Hot Topic when it comes to the Discussion about whether they are efficient in their stated missions or not, and are being regarded as more International trade Orientated, than they are Interested in Helping the World Become a Better Place, Helping Children, and other Human Rights Related Issues. The one thing that has never come to the surface till now, which is becoming ever more talked about, and slowly going viral, is the money skimming scams committed by both Individuals within the UN, and the United Nations itself.
I Myself, have had two applications with the U.N. for Human Rights Issues, during the Process of which, i found out, that their supposed Human Rights Departments are Bogus Ghost Offices, especially the Hague Central Authorities of Each Nation, and that they are involved in a Money Skimming Scame in Cahoots with the Mediation Agency Mikk.ev.de – I Predict that the U.N. will be most probably dissolved within two decades or less, as the General Consensus is tending to view the U.N. as a Powerless Waste of Time and Money, designed more for Trade, than for Sanctioning Rogue Nations and Getting the Job Done.
There has arisen much dissidence as to the viability or usefulness of the existence of the UN over the last few years, and various attempts at clearing the air have been attempted by the UN to Justify their Existence and the Funding they receive from member Sovereign Nation States.
Even students like Rwanda Paktar have made astute comments to the question “Is United Nations a useless organisation?” and cited events which show that the existence and cost of the United Nations is of no use to anybody whatsoever, and here i quote his comments from Quora
“The UN is totally a useless organization. It was formed in the aftermath of WW2 , in order to maintain peace within all the nations. However, it has today become a spineless organization, with no say whatsoever.
The UN has become one of the most inefficient organizations. Even after 73 years after its existence, the UN has failed to end the world’s gravest concerns. Let us look at some of the issues UN has overlooked.
Rwanda Genocide :
In 1994, the UN; and I quote “ just stood and watched” the slaughter of 800,000 ethnic Tutsis, caused by the Hutu government.
Even though the UN declared it illegal , US simply attacked Iraq and remained there for seven long years , calling it as a war for democracy. What is the use of the UN when anyone can declare war on each other ?
In 1948,the UN pledged to split the land west of the dead sea into two states, namely Israel and Palestine. This is what they came up with.
The green areas would become Palestine, and the white ones Israel.
What a ridiculous plan ! Do you think such nations could coexist, when parts of them are split across hostile territory ?
Kashmir issue :
In 1947, India/Pakistan war took place over the princely state of Kashmir. The UN drew a Line of Control across the map. However, they did not complete the job. A small patch, also called as the Siachen Glacier, lies unclaimed up to this day.
The efficiency of the UN is worse then even the worst courts in the world. 73 years on, many issues are unresolved.
Perhaps the main reason why the UN is so inefficient is because the way it works. For a decision to be passed in the Security Council, one needs the “Yes” of all five permanent members- United States, United Kingdom, Russia, China and France.
These 5 members have veto power, thus they can forbid any decision from being passed. A single amendment requires months, if not years to be passed, in order to appease all the five Veto Nations.
What’s worse, the five nations take diametrically opposite stances on such grave issues.
The UN also recommends countries to take a particular stance even though the countries don’t wish to. For example, the UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees) forces countries to accept refugees. It is very easy to give such advices, especially when you are not the one paying for it.
The permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (also known as the Permanent Five, Big Five, or P5) are the five states which the UN Charter of 1945 grants a permanent seat on the UN Security Council: China (formerly the Republic of China), France, Russia (formerly the Soviet Union), the United Kingdom, and the United States.
These countries were all allies in World War II, which turned out victorious. They are also all nuclear weapons states. A total of 15 UN member states serve on the UNSC, the remainder of which are elected. Any one of the five permanent members have the power of veto, which enables them to prevent the adoption of any “substantive” draft Council resolution, regardless of its level of international support
The UN at least claims to have had some efficiency until the 90’s. That was because both the superpowers, the US and the USSR , held a delicate balance in the General Assembly. After the fragmentation of the USSR, there is only one superpower, which has further reduced the UN efficiency. The UN is now heavily biased when it comes to countries having sour relations with the US.
So the UN is essentially useless. It is biased and inefficient. It doesn’t serve the very purpose it was meant for.
To quote foreign affairs website;
“Any assessment of the United Nations’ performance must begin by acknowledging that it is not a monolithic institution but a composite of various parts, which are often conflated by its detractors. When critics invoke the United Nations, do they mean the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), dominated by the great powers and charged with enforcing global peace and security? “
“Are they referring to the UN General Assembly (UNGA), the world’s noisy but largely toothless town hall, or to other large-membership bodies such as the Human Rights Council? Do they mean the dozens of UN specialized agencies, programs, and funds, such as the International Atomic Energy Agency and the UN High Commission for Refugees? Or are they critiquing the UN Secretariat itself, within which Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon oversees myriad departments devoted to development, disarmament, peacekeeping, and the like? ”
The Truth is, in My Opinion, the UN is merely a Fake Money Skimming Operation for Corporate Businessmen who buy their way into Politics with Bribery, Bloodlines, Money and Philanthropy. in order to increase their own personal gains and interest, and have power over the world.