“Analyze Your Mind: A.I. Simulates a Conversation with Sigmund Freud and Adolf Grünbaum!”

I created a simulation of two conversations between two great psychiatric and philosophical geniuses, using A.I. The first conversation is one about A.I. conducted between Sigmund Freud and Grunbaum, and the second dialogue, is about Nihilism, and Existentialism. And indeed what is Nihilism and Existentialism?

The greater part of the content, namely the conversation itself, is completely A.I. generated from Open A.I.’s Gpt CHAT, and, using GPT3 AI Content Generator for WordPress, which is a free/paid plugin for bloggers to use Gpt3 A.I. Chatbot to generate content and ideas for their blogs, as well as for other purposes. So, here is what Artificial Sigmund and Adolf ‘virtually’ had to say to each other;

Introduction

A.I. Simulates a Conversation with Sigmund Freud and Adolf Grünbaum, is an interactive dialogue between two of the most influential minds in psychology. Participants can explore the theories and ideas of Freud and Grünbaum and gain insight into the foundations of psychotherapy and philosophical psychology. This dialogue allows users to get a glimpse into the thoughts of two of the most influential figures in psychology and gain insight into the theories they developed and their views on various topics. The conversation between the two is designed to be highly engaging and thought-provoking, allowing users to gain a better understanding of the two men and their respective theories.

Exploring the Complexity of A.I. Conversation Technology through a Dialogue between Sigmund Freud and Adolf GrünbaumA.I. Simulates a Conversation with Sigmund Freud and Adolf Grünbaum

Adolf Grünbaum: Dr. Freud, how do you think artificial intelligence conversation technology has changed the way we interact with one another?

Sigmund Freud: I think it is a remarkable development! It has enabled us to communicate more efficiently and effectively. We can now have conversations with machines that can understand our language and respond to our questions and statements. This technology has allowed us to explore new forms of communication and to gain deeper insights into ourselves and the world around us.

Adolf Grünbaum: What do you think are the potential benefits and risks of using A.I. conversation technology?

Sigmund Freud: It is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it can be used to open up new possibilities in communication and understanding between people. On the other hand, it can be misused to manipulate or deceive people. It is important to remember that it is still a relatively new technology, and so its potential implications are still being explored. We should use it with caution and be aware of the potential risks.

Analyzing the Potential of Artificial Intelligence Technology to Resolve Philosophical Debates between Freud and Grünbaum

Freud: How can Artificial Intelligence technology help us settle this debate?

Grünbaum: AI technology can help us better understand the nuances of our debate. We can use AI to analyze and process the data of our arguments, which could aid us in finding a resolution.

Freud: That is an intriguing idea. We have both invested a great deal of time in this debate, and I would love to see it resolved.

Grünbaum: Yes, it could make a great difference in the field of philosophy if we could find a way to use AI to help us come to a resolution.

Freud: I agree. Let us explore the potential of AI technology to help us settle this debate.

Grünbaum: We could use AI to analyze the data of our arguments and come to a conclusion based on the data. This could help us find common ground and come to a resolution more quickly.

Freud: That is a very inspiring idea. I think this could be a great way to move the debate forward.

Grünbaum: Absolutely. With the help of AI technology, we may be able to find a resolution to this philosophical debate that has been going on for so long. Let us proceed by asking Gpt CHAT; “Simulate a Conversation between Sigmund Freud and Myself, in less than 400 words, about nihilism, and existentialism”.

Gpt CHAT; Okay here it is;

Adolf Grünbaum and Sigmund Freud in Conversation

Freud: Greetings Grünbaum, what do you think about the current philosophical trends of nihilism and existentialism?

Grünbaum: Freud, I see these trends as a reaction to the lack of meaning and purpose in life, but I reject their conclusions.

Freud: I understand your perspective, but I believe that these movements hold some truth. Our conscious and unconscious thoughts can shape our existence and give it meaning.

Grünbaum: But what about the objective reality? How can subjective experiences create meaning in a meaningless world?

Freud: The question of objective reality is a philosophical one, but what I am more concerned with is the individual’s subjective reality. Our experiences and emotions shape the way we perceive the world and our place in it.

Grünbaum: I agree that subjective experiences are important, but I cannot accept the idea that they create meaning in a meaningless world. That would lead to a nihilistic view that everything is arbitrary.

Freud: Nihilism may be a frightening prospect, but it can also lead to a liberation of the self, a rejection of societal norms and expectations. It can allow individuals to create their own meaning and purpose.

Grünbaum: But without any objective basis, this purpose becomes arbitrary and uncertain. It leads to a kind of existential anxiety that can be paralyzing.

Freud: I see your point, but it is the human condition to struggle with uncertainty and anxiety. The key is to find a way to manage these feelings and create meaning for oneself.

Grünbaum: I believe that meaning must come from a connection to something greater than oneself, a connection to a transcendent reality.

Freud: I can understand why you would seek comfort in a higher power, but for many individuals, it is not enough. They need to find meaning within themselves and in their relationships with others.

Grünbaum: That may be true for some, but I still believe that there must be a transcendent basis for meaning. Otherwise, we are left with a meaningless and empty existence.

Freud: Our views may differ, but I appreciate the lively discussion. It is important to examine and question the sources of meaning and purpose in our lives.

Conclusion

The conversation between Sigmund Freud and Adolf Grünbaum provides a unique insight into the two men’s differing perspectives on the human psyche, as well as their different approaches to psychology and psychotherapy. Despite their disagreements, both men expressed a mutual respect for each other, and an appreciation for the importance of open dialogue and debate. Ultimately, the A.I. simulated conversation between Freud and Grünbaum serves as a reminder of the potential for artificial intelligence to open up a new level of understanding of the human condition.

Adolf Grünbaum and Sigmund Freud

Conclusion on this conversation, noting the differences and similarities between each conversant, and summarize it in terms of psychiatric science;

In conclusion, Freud and Grünbaum have different views on the question of meaning and purpose in life, with Freud leaning towards a more individualistic and subjective perspective, while Grünbaum advocates for a transcendent basis for meaning.

Freud sees the current philosophical trends of nihilism and existentialism as a reaction to the lack of meaning in life, and believes that our conscious and unconscious thoughts can shape our existence and give it meaning. On the other hand, Grünbaum argues that meaning must come from a connection to something greater than oneself, and rejects the idea that subjective experiences can create meaning in a meaningless world.

From a psychiatric perspective, these differing views can be seen as reflecting different coping mechanisms for dealing with uncertainty and anxiety, a common human condition. Some individuals find meaning within themselves and their relationships, while others seek comfort in a higher power. Ultimately, examining and questioning the sources of meaning and purpose can be beneficial in personal growth and self-discovery.

Myths Persist Throughout all Eras – the deluge myth has been recounted in the Epic of Gilgamesh, the Bible, the Torah, and the Koran. Myths seem to survive the rise and fall of civilizations, religions, and even cataclysms and mass extinctions.

We have had 25 Mass Extinctions (26 Including this Human induced mass extinction of species on earth), the 5 major ones being  the Ordovician Mass Extinction, Devonian Mass Extinction, Permian Mass Extinction, Triassic-Jurassic Mass Extinction, and Cretaceous-Tertiary.

This, and the concept of A.I. (Artificial Intelligence) Algorithms with machine learning (the program teaches itself without human intervention) being the same process found in Nature’s Evolutionary Algorithms. Creation and Evolution is limited to a certain geometric pattern of self growth and development, and is unescapable, be it nature’s Invisible Process of Evolution, or Human Created Self Learning Machine learning deep Learning A.I. Algorithms. But Civilizations suffer Cataclysms and Fall Into Entropy, or suffer Catabolic Entropy and dissilve through lack of  resources due to fast growth, fall of economy, rebellions , the Steady State, Production in relation to Expansion, and so on.

I delve into Cyberpunk a bit at the end and talk about how the respective benefits and deficits which lie between Artificial Intelligence, and those found in Living Sentient beings (in this case, Humans), will inevitably blend and fuse together in a symbiosis of Human and Machine, Mind and A.I.

I wish I could have had time to go into machine A.I. as to how the inclusion of a conscience (set rules of ethics) should be programmed into a DEEP LEARNING ALGORHYTHM, in order to make sure no conditioned ethics are present.

But that a set of truly universally fair, and logical decisions can be made when confronting social, religious, legal or other dilemmas. The A.I. state oof the art in the moment is able to map the universe, and do scientific computations, and also make simple decisions as to what it thinks we might want. But that’s it.

 “In Space Odyssey 2001, HAL 9000, the Heuristically Programmed Algorithmic Computer, consigned the crew commander to his death by refusing to open the pod bay doors. Leaping forward to today, with life hopefully transcending Arthur C. Clarke’s fiction, NASA has announced a visionary step: that intelligent computer systems will be installed on space probes”

(The Daily Galaxy)

An algorithm, such as if a cyborg police officer sees that he can either save the victim and let the criminal escape, and be destroyed himself in the process, or, catch the criminal and lose the victim who would die, or, sacrifice itself and save the victim whilst killing the criminal.

cyberpunks

How could the A.I. decide what to do?,  if its only command, was to apprehend the criminal alive, or to apprehend the criminal and save the victim? What set of ethics if any should be programmed into the laws of robotics and of A.I. machine learning algorithms ???

The topics and categories and rankings given with the current sets and modules of algorithms in Deep learning, despite producing amazing feats, are still missing too many abstract variables of living human society, in order to make accurate conclusions and decisions. Life is not a game of GO, and Alpha Go cannot give life advice to Humans, and probably never will be able to.

Computer vision models are struggling to appropriately tag depictions of the new scenes or situations we find ourselves in during the COVID-19 era. Categories have shifted. For example, say there’s an image of a father working at home while his son is playing. AI is still categorizing it as “leisure” or “relaxation.” It is not identifying this as ‘”work” or “office,” despite the fact that working with your kids next to you is the very common reality for many families during this time.”

(Techcrunch).

The algorithm of evolutionary progress of Civilizations seems to indicate that all Civilizations have a limited lifespan for their rise and fall, and mathematicians and statisticians are trying to create algorithms ,to calculate just how much longer our civilisation itself has left, before it falls.

“The collapse of complex human societies remains poorly understood and current theories fail to model important features of historical examples of collapse. Relationships among resources, capital, waste, and production form the basis for an ecological model of collapse in which production fails to meet maintenance requirements for existing capital. Societies facing such crises after having depleted essential resources risk catabolic collapse, a self-reinforcing cycle of contraction converting most capital to waste. This model allows key features of historical examples of collapse to be accounted for, and suggests parallels between successional processes in nonhuman ecosystems and collapse phenomena in human societies.”

(Ecoshock.Org) – Highly recommended PDF on The Human Ecology of  Catabolic Collapse!!!

Neuralink as a solution to the failings of A.I. and the Dangers it may present to Humanity.

However, Elon Musk’s Neuralink, seems to be the answer, a very ‘Cyberpunk’ solution, to the dangers of the rise of A.I. and Robotics, and Androids.

The study of the state of Existential Risk is an important study for Humanity to focus o, as we are in my belief, truly in danger of extinction due to Catabolic Collapse

Grammarly - Authoring to remove Personal Style on a Global Scale

When it comes to the Poetic Genius, and High Prose, I am most certain, that the Great Poets, such as Yeats, Blake, and the Poet Laureate Lord Tennyson won’t make it with #Grammarly writing assistant.  Nor would Genial Worrdsmiths like Stanley Unwin, or Slangsters and Gangstas. When we come to think about it, the irony is, that ‘Grammarly‘ Isn’t even a Word anyway! Grammarly is also Unethical and deceptive in its Corporate Attitude, with Fake Close Buttons on their Ads that Lead to Web Pages

I mean where is the word ‘Grammarly’ to be found in the English Dictionary? Ask an NFL Player perhaps?

If everybody used Grammarly to write with, it would make all authors of the world write as if the same person were to be writing, and we would have no more Poetic Genius, or development of the use of and meaning of Semantics, as the meanings and uses of words change with time, and from region to region.

I an I wanna Know how da gang gonna do wit’ Grammarly. But i am completely aware and deeply understanding of the complete superflous-ness of such a ‘writing assistant’

The word Superflous, Meaning su·per·flu·ous/so͞oˈpərflo͞oəs/ (I wonder How Grammarly would want me to change that line?). Should we let Grammarly become the only Author behind every writer’s style of expression? Forcing the Human Author to write according to how Grammarly thinks best? Grammarly isn’t even a real word!

I mean Bro, if I-an-I wanna write like-a dis’, den I-an I a gonna write like-a dis, an it-a gonna have it’ own kain’-a Stylee.. itta ding dat allright Mon.. Write how-a you wanna write, an’ use da tings dat ya wanna use ta get ya point across! Hav’ yer own stylee, an do it Original Stylee.

Grammarly is an A.I. driven Authoring software putting the world's literature in danger, to remove Personal Style on a Global Scale

Grammarly is an A.I. driven Authoring software putting the world’s literature in danger, to remove Personal Style on a Global Scale. These analytics are mostly buried in search engine results due to Grammarly paying bloggers and micro influencers to write and create content, to bury any bad reviews down to second or third page in search results.

Bumbaklaat Raasklaat Grammarly! You don’t know how Modern Punctuation is used by Modern Humans to express themselves freely, and want everybody to write the same as the team who programmed grammarly’s Dictionary! A Plethora of Books and Authors, all written by and A.I. algorithm called Gramarly!

Stanley Unwin Intentional Bad Grammar

Stanley Unwin Intentional Bad Grammar

Unless of Course, You Play with the NFL or know how to Watch TV instead of Read Words.

NFL Fans Literary Genius with grammarly

Original Stylee; 5 – Grammarly; 0

William Blake 10 – Grammarly 0

Anybody who uses Facebook will have seen at least one ‘Friendversary’ video made by Facebook, which may or may not seem to have any relevance, but more often than not, tend towards irrelevance, more than relevance. The thing is, it is in truth, an A.I. Artificial Intelligence algorithm created video designed as a ‘Call to Action’ mechanism (share button), designed specifically to make you share to your profile or elsewhere within Facebook’s Monopolistic network. For Facebook is a Network that tries to keep its viewers within its own Matrix, (one we would all like to be free of so click the link in the word matrix to see how). Facebook and similar domans are ever more designed to prevent us the users, from leaving to visit an external website.

Facebook Friendversary

Facebook Friendversary

The Faceboook Friendversary Video is not visible to anybody unless you share it (which is what makes it a call to action banner, designed to influence You to share the A.I. Created FB Content.

The idea i believe, is that Facebook can create masses of automated content and overtake all the other major domains with all types of media (in this case, video, which would directly affect YouTube, which does not use A.I. to auto-create its’ own videos, whereas Facebook Does!).

In the case where more types of autocreated content such as Friendversaries are added, if shared as Facebook intends, and hence published and filed within search engine bot databases, will increase their amount of content within Facebook many-fold on an ever increasing ratio. There is much danger in this, for Facebook already prevents you from going to Youtube when watching a shared video within the Facebook Mobile App. Instead, it takes you to a Facebook page with the Youtube Video Inserted into the page as an iframe embedded within Facebook. But Hey, one strange thought is “Wow! what would a Friendversary video look like between two Facebook Friends who spent 5 years arguing and insulting each other publicly? And what content would the video contain?”

The Friendversary

Luckily, for now, Artificial Intelligence, is Artificial Stupidity, but could become a Content Creation Virus

‘Facebook Friendversaries’, and Autocreated videos and ‘Memories’ Albums using ‘Artificial Intelligence’ algorithms, is still in its early days, and has omitted various important factors in its algorithms, such as making the assumption that the date of when a photo was taken has relevance enough to add to an album of ‘memories’ when in truth, we don’t just take photos with our device camera, and we also download images to the camera roll of our devices from the internet in a browser, which are dated,. We also don’t just take photos of family, rather, we make photos for work, play, official business, etc.

 

So the compilation algorithm for albums and videos like this ‘Facebook Friendversary’, have little chance of gaining any relevance, unless they add much more spying on the user to their datamining (which is unethical unless they pay us for the data gathered from us), and also add many more criteria for selecting images, events and other connections between ‘friends’, and the algorithm that selects which of the many ‘friends’ we add on Facebook and other networks, are true friends and relations, and which are just ‘added as friend’ type unknowns. In its current ‘state of the art’, Artificial Intelligence is in the stone age, and should be seen more as ‘Artificial Stupidity’.

I henceforth declare the danger of an artificial intelligence becoming an autocreated content viral phenomenon taking over the internet, and stealing most of the traffic for the big matrix-like self contained networks, such as Facebook, Google, MSN, Yahoo, and the like.

Below Pic; ‘Ascending Chaos – A Collage of Collages‘ (Source gentleice the deptfordian)

I also henceforth predict the evolution of social networks to become not flat A.I. generated networks on websites in a flat browser like Facebook, rather, that the Future of social networking is to become much more of a different type of platform and of a different nature, namely, the VR Experience.

Many people say that A.I. is destroying many jobs, which it is, but it is also creating new professions; Believe it or not, there are hundreds and thousands of new professions arising, as old ones die.. transformation is the only constant.

In 1900 something like 86% of america worked the land. But in the present day, something like the same, 86% (rough memory of a real statistic i learned), who worked in agriculture, now work in service industries, whilst farming has become ever more automated.

But the population increased and still people are working, in jobs which did not exist in 1900, but machines now do what people had to do in 1900 .. so the trick is in SEEING ahead that taxi drivers wont be needed when Uber has self driven flying cars, but that flying car central control office will be needing co-ordinators to manage the databases and to make sure that all lines are working in order.

And to see, that jobs like the lawyer profession, will become very much needed, because so much technology change, means we have to constantly keep up with the tech, by writing new laws to cover the legal issues new technology brings with it

As an example of this, we can already mention. Amazon Drone Delivery, Video Advertising on YouTube and Facebook, A.I. Screening of Live Video Content to prevent live suicides going viral and similar tragedies. Legal issues such as ‘can we fly drones over borders if no person is in it’?, how high can a drone fly without registering with the airport flight tower? etc…)

We need to look and to see new jobs arising, like space miners on asteroids, and mathematicians and astrophysicists, geologists for planetary excavations and astro-geology, astro-biologist, – we are now traveling to mars, and we are going to colonize it, and mine asteroids, we shall need programmers for the a.i. that does all the dirty work for us, we shall need designers for the digital goods like game add-ons, and new game levels. AS technology in VR and Augmented Reality develops, Social networking will also become a VR 3D experience where we meet up like ‘ready player one’… and FB will either be part of that, or die., VR Chat is already here on Steam and we can meet up there and be who we wanna be look like we wanna look, and live a fantasy surrogate life. If Facebook will be part of that, remains to be seen, for they appear to be thinking in Flatland.